October 9, 2026/
Gifting Shares to Family Members: Capital Gains Tax, Holdover Relief and Family...
Alphabet Shares Can Offer Flexibility — But They Need to Be Structured Properly
Alphabet shares are widely used by UK owner-managed and family companies where shareholders want greater flexibility over dividends, voting rights or ownership arrangements.
Instead of every shareholder holding the same class of ordinary shares, a company may create separate classes such as A Ordinary, B Ordinary and C Ordinary shares. Subject to the rights attached to each class and the company’s distributable profits, this can allow different dividends to be declared on different classes.
That flexibility can be useful. However, alphabet shares are not simply a mechanism for directing company profits to whichever shareholder has the lowest tax rate.
Poorly designed arrangements can create problems under company law, the settlements legislation and the employment-related securities rules. HMRC’s own manuals specifically address arrangements involving different share classes and selective dividends. (GOV.UK)
Alphabet shares are different classes of shares in a company, commonly labelled A, B, C and so on, with rights defined by the company’s articles of association or other constitutional documents. They can allow a company to vary dividend, voting or capital rights between shareholders, provided the structure and subsequent payments comply with company law and tax legislation.
For example, a family company might have:
Where the share rights have been properly established, the directors may potentially declare a dividend on one class without necessarily declaring the same dividend on another class.
Different classes can also carry different voting or capital rights. HMRC itself recognises that companies can issue different classes of shares and that the distinctions between them are commonly expressed through dividend, voting and capital rights. (GOV.UK)
The precise rights matter. Calling shares “A”, “B” and “C” does not, by itself, determine their legal or tax treatment.
One of the main attractions of an alphabet share structure is dividend flexibility.
Consider a company owned by three family members. One shareholder may already have substantial income from another source, while another may have considerably lower taxable income.
If everyone owns identical ordinary shares with identical dividend rights, declaring a dividend will ordinarily result in shareholders of that class receiving dividends according to their respective holdings.
Separate share classes can provide greater flexibility over which class receives a dividend and when.
Alphabet shares can therefore form part of legitimate commercial, succession and remuneration planning. But the tax consequences depend on the substance of the arrangements, not merely the labels attached to the shares.
Gifting Shares to Family Members: Capital Gains Tax, Holdover Relief and Family...
Sole Traders and Landlords Earning Over £30,000 Must Prepare for April 2027:...
SSAS Pension: Tax Benefits, Property Investment and Rules for Directors Home Blogs...
Business Property Relief: What the £2.5m Cap Means for You Home Blogs...
Business & Tax News and Developments September 2026 Home News Business &...
Right to Work Checks Change on 1 October 2026: What Employers Must...
There is no general rule making alphabet shares unacceptable for tax purposes. The risk arises from how the shares are created, what rights they carry and how dividends are subsequently used.
Several areas deserve particular attention.
Many directors of owner-managed companies adopt a combination of salary and dividends.
There is an important distinction, however, between receiving a genuine dividend because someone owns shares and using specially designed shares as a mechanism for converting what is effectively employment remuneration into dividend income.
HMRC’s Employment Related Securities Manual specifically describes an “alphabet soup” example involving special classes of shares used to pay all or most of employees’ wages as dividends. In HMRC’s example, each employee has a separate share class and the shares have no substantive rights other than enabling the employer to award dividends at its discretion. HMRC considers the resulting artificial increases in share value capable of falling within the employment-related securities rules. (GOV.UK)
HMRC guidance also states that where dividends on special shares are used in avoidance arrangements as disguised cash bonuses or additional remuneration, employment-related securities provisions can potentially apply. (GOV.UK)
This does not mean that every dividend received by a director or employee shareholder becomes employment income. HMRC’s guidance acknowledges that normal dividends are generally dealt with under the ordinary dividend income rules. (GOV.UK)
The distinction is therefore critical: is the payment genuinely a return on the shareholder’s investment, or is the share structure effectively being used to deliver employment reward?
Where shares are acquired by directors or employees, the employment-related securities — or ERS — regime under Part 7 of ITEPA 2003 should also be considered.
HMRC states that shares and securities acquired in connection with employment can fall within the ERS regime, including shares acquired by directors or employees when a company is formed. (GOV.UK)
That does not automatically create a tax charge. For example, HMRC confirms that where a founder/director pays full market value for shares, their status as employment-related securities does not itself create an acquisition charge. Normal commercial growth and genuine dividends out of commercial profits can subsequently receive their normal tax treatment. (GOV.UK)
The position becomes more complicated where shares are issued cheaply, rights are subsequently altered, value is shifted between classes or arrangements artificially enhance the value of an employee’s shares.
Companies should also consider whether an acquisition, alteration of share rights or other transaction creates an ERS reporting obligation. HMRC’s current guidance confirms that reportable events can include share awards and changes to rights attached to securities. (GOV.UK)
Alphabet shares involving directors or employees should therefore be reviewed not only from a dividend-tax perspective but also through the ERS rules.
Alphabet shares are particularly common in family companies, but this is also where the settlements anti-avoidance legislation can become relevant.
The rules are designed, broadly, to prevent income belonging economically to one person from being diverted to another through certain arrangements while retaining the benefit of that income within the family or household.
HMRC’s guidance on dividend waivers highlights circumstances where a shareholder gives up dividend entitlement so that another shareholder can receive a larger distribution. Factors HMRC considers relevant include whether the company had sufficient retained profits to pay the same rate of dividend across the shares without the waiver and whether there has been a pattern of similar arrangements. (GOV.UK)
Alphabet shares can create related concerns where the economic effect is to divert profits selectively between family members without sufficient commercial substance.
This is an area where the facts matter considerably. The relationship between the shareholders, how and when shares were acquired, the rights attached to each class, the company’s distributable reserves and the pattern of dividends can all affect the analysis.
A structure should therefore be assessed as a whole rather than assuming that separate share classes automatically provide unrestricted freedom to allocate profits between family members.
A lifetime gift of property is normally treated as a Potentially Exempt Transfer (PET) for IHT purposes.
This means:
The full 40% IHT rate can apply to gifts made within three years of death, subject to available nil-rate bands. Taper relief may reduce the effective rate after three years.
Importantly, families should understand that gifting an investment property can potentially expose them to both CGT immediately and IHT later if death occurs within seven years.
A tax-efficient dividend is of little value if it has not been lawfully declared.
Under section 830 of the Companies Act 2006, a company may only make a distribution out of profits available for that purpose. The legislation contains further requirements governing how distributable profits are established by reference to the company’s accounts. (Legislation.gov.uk)
Before declaring an alphabet share dividend, directors should therefore establish that sufficient distributable reserves exist and that the dividend is permitted under the rights attached to the relevant share class.
The company’s articles of association and share documentation need particular attention.
For company law purposes, shares belong to one class where the rights attached to them are uniform. Merely changing the name printed against otherwise identical shares does not necessarily produce the intended legal distinction between share classes.
The company’s constitutional documents should clearly establish what rights attach to each class, including where relevant:
This is one reason why simply renaming existing ordinary shares “A”, “B” and “C” without reviewing the articles can create unnecessary risk.
Alphabet shares should be designed around a genuine commercial and ownership objective rather than introduced immediately before a desired dividend payment.
Before implementing an alphabet share structure, directors should consider the existing share capital, current articles of association, intended rights of each shareholder, whether any shareholders are employees or directors, the market value of the shares and the intended pattern of future dividends.
The implementation itself may require amendments to the articles, shareholder and board resolutions, Companies House filings and appropriate updates to the company’s statutory registers.
Once the structure is established, the paperwork should match what actually happens.
Board minutes, dividend vouchers and accounting records should identify the relevant share class and dividend correctly. The company should also confirm that adequate distributable reserves exist before each dividend is declared.
From a tax advisory perspective, the biggest mistake with alphabet shares is treating them as a simple dividend-splitting exercise.
The better starting point is to ask: why does the company need different share classes, what genuine rights will each class carry, and what commercial relationship does each shareholder have with the business?
If the only practical purpose of a newly created share class is to channel profits to a particular family member or replace remuneration that would otherwise have been paid as salary or bonus, the arrangement deserves much closer scrutiny.
A well-structured alphabet share arrangement should be capable of standing up to examination beyond the immediate tax saving.
For example, consider two scenarios.
Scenario A: Two spouses have genuine long-term ownership interests in a family company, hold properly constituted separate share classes with meaningful rights, and dividends are declared from genuine commercial profits in accordance with those rights.
Scenario B: An employee receives a specially created share carrying minimal substantive rights and receives dividends broadly corresponding to the bonus they would otherwise have earned.
Both involve alphabet shares, but their tax risk profiles are very different. HMRC’s own ERS guidance demonstrates why arrangements resembling the second scenario require particular caution. (GOV.UK)
The structure should therefore be reviewed before shares are issued or rights are changed, rather than after dividends have already been paid.
Alphabet shares can provide UK owner-managed businesses with useful flexibility over ownership, dividends and succession planning.
But flexibility does not mean unlimited freedom to allocate company profits according to whichever shareholder has the most favourable tax position.
The share rights must be properly established. Dividends must comply with company law. Employment-related securities and reporting obligations may need to be considered for directors and employees. Family arrangements may require analysis under the settlements legislation.
Most importantly, the legal documents, commercial rationale and actual operation of the company should tell the same story.
Where substantial dividends or changes in family ownership are being considered, obtaining advice before restructuring the share capital can be considerably less expensive than trying to defend or correct an arrangement later.
Naail & Co can review your existing share structure, intended dividend arrangements and the potential UK tax implications before changes are implemented.
Where legal changes to the company’s articles or shareholder rights are required, these should also be properly documented and, where appropriate, coordinated with suitable company law advice.
Get in touch with Naail & Co to book your free initial consultation.
Monday – Friday
9:00 am – 5:30 pm
Alphabet shares are separate classes of company shares, commonly labelled A, B, C and so on, which can carry different rights. They are frequently used by owner-managed and family companies to provide flexibility over dividends, voting rights and capital entitlements. The rights attached to each class should be properly defined in the company’s articles of association and supporting corporate documentation.
Alphabet shares can allow a company to declare different dividends on different share classes, provided the share rights permit this and company law requirements are met. For example, a dividend could potentially be declared on A Ordinary shares without declaring the same dividend on B Ordinary shares. The company must have sufficient distributable profits, and the dividend must be properly authorised and documented.
Alphabet shares can provide greater flexibility over how genuine company profits are distributed among family shareholders. This may be useful where shareholders have different income levels or financial requirements. However, alphabet shares do not provide unrestricted freedom to divert income to the lowest-taxed family member. HMRC may consider the settlements legislation where arrangements effectively transfer income between family members without sufficient commercial substance.
Yes, alphabet shares may form part of legitimate dividend and tax planning, but the structure must be commercially and legally defensible. Different share classes can allow dividends to be paid selectively rather than automatically at the same rate to every shareholder. However, HMRC may challenge arrangements involving artificial income diversion, disguised employment remuneration or other tax-driven arrangements that do not reflect genuine share ownership.
Alphabet shares should ideally be established before the company needs to make selective dividend payments or implement wider ownership planning. Introducing a new share class immediately before a substantial dividend can warrant closer examination of the commercial rationale. Directors should review the company’s existing articles, share rights, shareholder objectives, distributable reserves, tax implications and any employment-related securities requirements before implementing the structure.
Alphabet shares can create Companies House filing requirements and, in some circumstances, HMRC reporting obligations. Changes to a company’s share structure may require resolutions, statutory register updates and relevant Companies House filings. Where shares are acquired by directors or employees, the employment-related securities rules should also be considered, including whether an ERS return or other reporting is required. The exact obligations depend on how the shares are created or altered.
The main tax risks include the settlements legislation, employment-related securities rules and attempts to disguise employment income as dividends. HMRC is more likely to scrutinise arrangements where dividends appear linked to an employee’s performance, replace salary or bonuses, or selectively divert family company profits for primarily tax-driven reasons. Proper share rights, commercial rationale, valuations where relevant and consistent documentation can materially reduce avoidable risk.
Simply relabelling ordinary shares as A, B or C shares may not create genuinely different share classes. Under the Companies Act 2006, shares are treated as one class where the rights attached to them are uniform. Companies should therefore review and, where necessary, amend their articles of association so the rights attached to each class are properly established before relying on an alphabet share structure for selective dividends or other planning.
Common mistakes include poorly drafted share rights, unlawful dividends, inadequate documentation and treating alphabet shares purely as a tax-saving device. Other problems include failing to check distributable reserves, overlooking employment-related securities reporting, paying dividends inconsistently with the articles and ignoring the settlements legislation in family companies. Board minutes, resolutions, dividend vouchers, statutory registers and Companies House records should accurately reflect the structure and transactions undertaken.
The cost of setting up alphabet shares depends on the complexity of the existing company and the changes required. A straightforward structure may involve reviewing or amending the articles, creating new share classes, preparing resolutions, updating statutory registers and completing Companies House filings. More complex arrangements may require tax advice, share valuations or specialist legal input. The structure should be reviewed before implementation so the scope and cost can be determined accurately.
Gifting Shares to Family Members: Capital Gains Tax, Holdover Relief and Family Succession Planning Home Blogs Gifting Shares to Family...
Sole Traders and Landlords Earning Over £30,000 Must Prepare for April 2027: Making Tax Digital for Income Tax Home Blogs...
SSAS Pension: Tax Benefits, Property Investment and Rules for Directors Home Blogs SSAS Pension: Tax Benefits, Property Investment and Rules...
Subscribe to our newsletter to receive our weekly feed.
69-71 Lambeth Walk London SE11 6DX
Monday – Friday 9:00 am – 5:30 pm
Subscribe to our newsletter
Follow us
Download from
Services
DROP US A LINE
Copyright 2024 Naail & Co | Designed by Orion Global Consulting. | Naail & Co is the trading name of Naail & Co Ltd | Company registration number 08606377 | VAT registration number 170 3380 31
